goglthing.blogg.se

Editready benchmark imac 5k
Editready benchmark imac 5k





editready benchmark imac 5k
  1. Editready benchmark imac 5k pro#
  2. Editready benchmark imac 5k software#
  3. Editready benchmark imac 5k mac#

With poor CPU-core utilization, the performance difference is at least in part due to clock speed (5.0 GHz maximum on the iMacs vs maximum 4.4 GHz on the Mac Pro, though the use of 2-4 CPU cores drops those figures).

editready benchmark imac 5k

Editready benchmark imac 5k pro#

This improves things considerably In the Unigine Valley benchmark running under macOS 10.15.3, we see an improvement of around 18 by pegging the fan speed at max this way. The 2020 iMac 5K beats the 2019 Mac Pro handily, and 2019 iMac 5K by a trivial amount. Across the two tests, the new high-end Retina iMac scores 11-13 percent higher than the fastest non-Retina model due to the faster processor included on the Retina model.Ĭompared to the low-end Mac Pro, which runs on a quad-core 3.7 GHz Xeon E5-1620 v2, the high-end Retina iMac clocks in over 13 percent higher on multi-core testing, although it is unsurprisingly outclassed by higher-level Mac Pro models carrying processors with more cores.īoth Retina iMac processor options outperform all Mac Pro models on single-core benchmarks, but this is unsurprising as the Xeon processors used in the Mac Pro sacrifice single-core clock speed for many more cores and other benefits that enhance performance for professional-level applications that can take advantage of the multiple cores. Using that, we can force the iMac to run its fan at its maximum speed of 2850 RPM all the time, and observe the resulting performance gains. iMac 5K 4 GHz Radeon M295X vs 2013 Mac Pro 3.3 GHz 8-core D700. this is to be expected given the 56GB memory size needed for this test and the 32GB in the iMac. The 2019 iMac 5K handily beats the 2017 iMac 5K, the latter taking 81 longer.

editready benchmark imac 5k

Editready benchmark imac 5k software#

The 4.0 GHz Retina 5K iMac clocks in with a score of 4438 on the single-core 64-bit benchmarking test, while multi-core testing achieves a score of 16407. The 3.3 GHz 8-core Mac Pro outperforms a maxed-out iMac, the iMac taking about 90 longer to finish. The diglloyd Huge benchmark uses a mix of the core Photoshop operations with a file size that requires about 56GB of memory usage in Photoshop, far beyond what most users are likely to encounter. Earlier in the summer, Divergent Media, a software company whose tools need no introduction in the video production world, released EditReady, a Mac transcoding app with a tremendous claim, that it was supposedly the world's fastest transcoder for Quicktime conversion. Primate Labs' John Poole noted that once benchmarks for the high-end Retina 5K iMac with Intel's 4.0 GHz Core i7-4790K chip started appearing, they could show the new iMac outperforming the low-end Mac Pro, and that is indeed the case as revealed today and highlighted in an updated version of Poole's blog post from yesterday. Yesterday, Primate Labs highlighted some Geekbench 3 benchmarking results for the new 3.5 GHz 27-inch Retina 5K iMac, unsurprisingly showing the machine performing better than slower-clocked Core i5 chips in non-Retina models but below that of high-end Core i7 chips also available in the machines since their late 2013 introduction.







Editready benchmark imac 5k